Edinburgh International Surface Link
Outline proposals for review and comment
Home EARL, Gogar and trams Development and objectives EISL A EISL B Conclusions About

Conclusions and comparisons of EISL options

Two options have been presented here for review and comment. The principal characteristics of each option are summarised in Table 5 below.

EISL A EISL B
Distance from station to airport terminal 1,700m 300m
Link from station to terminal Automatically controlled elevated shuttles Moving walkway
Trains per hour each way
– Phase 1
– Phase 2
– Phase 3

8
12
17

4
9
17
Capital cost
– Phase 1
– Phase 2
– Phase 3
– Total (phased)

£534m
£130m
£226m
£890m

£249m
£283m
£150m
£682m
Capital cost
– simultaneous build

£844m

£600m
Additional operating and maintenance costs ~£6m p.a.(inc. airport shuttle) ~£2.6m p.a.
Minimum rail curve radius
– E&G line
– Airdrie – Bathgate line
– Fife loop

1000m
1000m
800m

625m
500m
625m
Track elevation at station
– Westbound
– Eastbound

+58m
+43m

+28m
+28m
Steepest uphill gradient
– E&G line
– Airdrie – Bathgate line
– Fife loop

1:250
1:250
1:115

1:110
1:85
1:100
Steepest downhill gradient
– E&G line
– Airdrie – Bathgate line
– Fife loop

1:100
1:100
1:60

1:110
1:50
1:50
Lowest speed constraint
– E&G line
– Airdrie – Bathgate line
– Fife loop

80mph
80mph
70mph

65mph
40mph
65mph
Journey time increase (including 150 seconds dwell at station)
– E&G line
– Airdrie – Bathgate line
– Fife loop

4 min
4 min
7 min

5 min
6 min
7 min
Airport expansion restrictions None Some minor redesign of expanded terminal and apron
RHC relocation restrictions Redesign of new RHC to include station and expansion south to M8 None

Table 5: Principal characteristics: EISL A and EISL B

Disclaimer         Home

Comments on the proposals are welcome and should be sent to: admin@eisl.org.uk